Self-Assessment
Backend Risk Self-Assessment for Seed & Series A Startups
A 5-minute diagnostic to evaluate whether your backend is structurally ready for growth, fundraising, or traffic spikes.
Designed for founders and early engineering teams under scaling pressure.
Backend Risk Self-Assessment
A structured diagnostic for Seed & Series A startups. Answer each question Yes or No. If you hesitate, count it as No.
How to use this assessment
Answer each question with Yes or No.
Be honest.
If you hesitate, count it as No.
Scalability Exposure
Do you know your current system's maximum sustainable throughput?
Have you load-tested beyond your highest production peak?
Is horizontal scaling automatic?
If traffic doubled tomorrow, do you know what would fail first?
Are background jobs protected against runaway queue growth?
Failure & Recovery Readiness
Do you track Mean Time To Recovery (MTTR)?
Is incident response documented?
Can you restore from backup within 60 minutes?
Are database migrations reversible?
Have you tested a full environment rebuild recently?
Observability & Blind Spots
Are critical business flows instrumented end-to-end?
Do you alert on business metrics (not only CPU/memory)?
Can you detect partial degradation automatically?
Are logs structured and queryable?
Do you have clear SLOs?
Cost & Architectural Risk
Do you know your most expensive AWS service per request?
Are there no single points of failure?
Are core services stateless?
Do you understand your cost scaling curve?
Can you estimate cost impact of 3x growth?
Founder Confidence Layer
Would you confidently walk through your architecture with a technical investor?
Do you know your top 3 structural risks?
Does your team agree on your biggest scaling constraint?
Would a major incident not materially disrupt fundraising or sales?
Your result
Scoring
Complete all 24 questions to see your score. (24 remaining)
Count your "No" answers:
0–5
Structurally stable for current scale
6–10
Growth fragility emerging
11–15
High structural risk under scale
16+
Significant exposure — audit strongly recommended
Most early-stage teams score between 8 and 14 "No" answers.
Scoring Guide
Count your “No” answers and find your risk band:
0–5 — Low Risk
Structurally stable for current scale
6–10 — Moderate
Growth fragility emerging
11–15 — High Risk
High structural risk under scale
16+ — Critical
Significant exposure — audit strongly recommended
Most early-stage teams score between 8 and 14 “No” answers.
Your score: ______ / 24 “No” answers
Risk band: ______________________________
What This Assessment Doesn't Tell You
This checklist highlights risk categories. It does not:
- Prioritize them by business impact
- Estimate the cost of inaction
- Model specific failure scenarios
- Suggest a 30–90 day remediation roadmap
That's what a structured production risk audit provides.
Limited to 2 engagements per month.
Elias Feijó — Backend Production Risk Audits
eliasfeijo.dev/risk-assessment
Want a professional deep-dive?
Book at eliasfeijo.dev